Passive Sichter, Bürokraten, developer, Sichter, Oberflächenadministratoren, Prüfer, Administratoren
7.914
Bearbeitungen
Nicht angemeldeter Benutzer - Bearbeiten von Seiten ist nur als angemeldeter Benutzer möglich.
Änderungen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
Zeile 9:
Zeile 9: + + + + + + + + +
Darstellung Integrativer Medizin in Onlineenzyklopädien (Quelltext anzeigen)
Version vom 1. August 2023, 15:03 Uhr
, 15:03, 1. Aug. 2023Antwort von Jimmy Wales
I am as big a defender of rationality, science, and objective reality as you are likely to find. But I also think a public resource like Wikipedia should be fully committed to intellectual tolerance and the free exchange of ideas. That, together with an interest in providing a way to resolve disputes, is just what drove me to advocate for and articulate the Wikipedia's neutrality policy. I have confidence that if CAM's advocates are given an opportunity to air their views fully and sympathetically—not to say they should be allowed to make Wikipedia assert their views—and skeptics are also given free rein to report their explanation of why they think CAM is a load of crap, then a rational reader will be given the tools he or she needs to take a reasonable position about the matter.
I am as big a defender of rationality, science, and objective reality as you are likely to find. But I also think a public resource like Wikipedia should be fully committed to intellectual tolerance and the free exchange of ideas. That, together with an interest in providing a way to resolve disputes, is just what drove me to advocate for and articulate the Wikipedia's neutrality policy. I have confidence that if CAM's advocates are given an opportunity to air their views fully and sympathetically—not to say they should be allowed to make Wikipedia assert their views—and skeptics are also given free rein to report their explanation of why they think CAM is a load of crap, then a rational reader will be given the tools he or she needs to take a reasonable position about the matter.
|Autor=Larry Sanger
|Autor=Larry Sanger
|Quelle=
|ref=<ref name=":0" />}}Jimmy Wales antwortete auf die an ihn gerichtete Petition:
{{Zitat
|Text=No, you have to be kidding me. Every single person who signed this petition needs to go back to check their premises and think harder about what it means to be honest, factual, truthful.
Wikipedia's policies around this kind of thing are exactly spot-on and correct. If you can get your work published in respectable scientific journals—that is to say, if you can produce evidence through replicable scientific experiments, then Wikipedia will cover it appropriately.
What we won't do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of "true scientific discourse." It isn't.
|Autor=Jimmy Wales
|Quelle=
|Quelle=
|ref=<ref name=":0" />}}
|ref=<ref name=":0" />}}